Penerapan Audit Forensik untuk Mengidentifikasi Penipuan Keuangan

Mujahid Syafurddin; Amri Amrulloh

doi:10.61132/moneter.v3i1.1121

Authors

Mujahid Syafurddin Universitas Terbuka
Amri Amrulloh Politeknik Negeri Madiun

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/moneter.v3i1.1121

Keywords:

Audit, Forensics, Fraud, Finance

Abstract

This study examines the theoretical foundation of applying forensic audits to identify financial fraud. It focuses on key factors such as auditor competence and professional skepticism, as discussed in various studies. Using a qualitative approach, data were collected through literature review to gather diverse perspectives on forensic audit practices and their effectiveness in detecting financial fraud. By analyzing various journals that employ a quantitative approach, this review identifies key themes such as auditor competency, professional skepticism, and audit techniques used in detecting fraud. The findings indicate that a combination of auditor expertise and skepticism can significantly enhance the effectiveness of forensic audits in detecting financial fraud. This review also concludes that forensic auditing is effective in uncovering various types of fraud.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Rahmawati, P., Simorangkir, R. G. (2021). Pengaruh akuntansi forensik, skeptisme profesional, dan pengalaman audit terhadap deteksi fraud. Jurnal Akuntansi, 7, 113–122.

Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. O., Albrecht, C. C., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2019). Fraud examination (6th ed.). Wiley.

Amrizal. (2013). Audit forensik (1st ed.). Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Biegelman, M. T., & Bartow, J. T. (2012). Executive roadmap to fraud prevention and internal control: Creating a culture of compliance. Wiley.

Gusnardi. (2012). Peran forensic accounting dalam pencegahan fraud.

Hadikusuma, H. (2010). Bahasa hukum Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni.

Hurtt, R. (2013). Research on auditor professional skepticism: Literature synthesis and opportunities for future research. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(SUPPL.1), 45–97. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50361

Karyono. (2013). Forensic fraud. Yogyakarta: CV. ANDI.

Knechel, W. R. (2012). Audit quality: Insights from the academic literature.

Kristanti, O., & Kuntadi, C. (2022). Literature review: Pengaruh audit forensik, audit investigatif, dan kompetensi auditor terhadap pengungkapan fraud. Jurnal Akuntansi, 1(3), 840–848.

Mulyadi, R., & Nawawi, M. (2020). Pengaruh audit forensik, audit investigasi, profesionalisme terhadap pencegahan kecurangan (Studi empiris pada BPKP Provinsi Banten). Jurnal Akuntansi, 13(2), 272–295.

Nelson, M. W. (2009). A model and literature review of professional skepticism in auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(2), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2009.28.2.1

Norbarani, L. (2012). Analisis fraud triangle yang diadopsi dalam SAS No. 99. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 2(99), 1–35.

Noviyanti, S. (2008). Skeptisme profesional auditor dalam mendeteksi kecurangan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2008.05

Price, J., & Norris, G. (2021). Building a fraud-aware organization: Training and prevention. Journal of Organizational Ethics, 45, 15–22. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv11i2art3

Ramos. (2019). The role of fraud diamond in detecting fraudulent financial statements. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i24.16838

Syahrul, & Nizar, M. (2000). Kamus akuntansi. Citra Narta Prima.

Tunggal, A. (2012). Audit kecurangan dan akuntansi forensik. Jakarta: Harvarindo.

W. S. Hopwood. (2012). Forensic accounting and fraud investigation. John Wiley & Sons. Retrieved from www.cpestore.com

Wells, J. T. (2013). Principles of fraud examination. Wiley.

Widiyastuti, M. (2009). Pengaruh kompetensi, independensi, dan profesionalisme terhadap kemampuan auditor dalam mendeteksi kecurangan (fraud). Jurnal Value Added, 5(2), 52–73.