Interaksi Antara Laporan Keuangan Konservatif dan Insentif Manajerial dalam Pengambilan Keputusan: Tinjauan Literatur

Authors

  • Ruslaini Ruslaini STIE Kasih Bangsa, Jakarta
  • Benardi Benardi STIE Kasih Bangsa, Jakarta
  • Tanti Sugiharti STIE Kasih Bangsa, Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/moneter.v2i4.914

Keywords:

Financial Reporting, Accounting Conservatism, Managerial Incentives, Decision-Making, Literature Review

Abstract

This study examines the interaction between conservative financial reporting and managerial incentives in decision-making, using a qualitative approach through a literature review. Conservative financial reporting plays a crucial role in enhancing the transparency and accuracy of information utilized by managers in the decision-making process. On the other hand, optimally designed managerial incentives can encourage managers to value and utilize the accounting information presented conservatively. The findings indicate that accounting conservatism can reduce the risk of inappropriate decision-making, although it may also pose potential risks of avoidance towards necessary investments for company growth. This research provides insights into the importance of balancing the implementation of conservative financial reporting and managerial incentives, as well as its implications for corporate performance. The results of this study are expected to serve as a reference for company management in designing more effective incentive systems and reporting.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., & Rey, P. (1997). Formal and real authority in organizations. Journal of Political Economy, 105(1), 1-29.

Armstrong, C., Guay, W. R., & Weber, J. (2010). The role of information and financial reporting in corporate governance and debt contracting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 179-234.

Ball, R. (2001). Infrastructure requirements for an economically efficient system of public financial reporting and disclosure. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services, 127-169.

Ball, R., & Shivakumar, L. (2005). Earnings quality in UK private firms: Comparative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 83-128.

Ball, R., Kothari, S. P., & Robin, A. (2000). The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(1), 1-51.

Ball, R., Kothari, S. P., & Robin, A. (2001). The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(1), 1-51.

Beatty, A. L., Ke, B., & Petroni, K. (2008). Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45(2-3), 378-397.

Beatty, A., Liao, S., & Weber, J. (2008). Financial reporting quality, private information, monitoring, and the institutions. The Accounting Review, 83(3), 659-686.

Beatty, A., Weber, J., & Yu, J. J. (2008). Conservatism and debt. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45(2-3), 154-174.

Basu, S. (1997). The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1), 3-37.

Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8-14.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.

Bushman, R. M., & Piotroski, J. D. (2006). Financial reporting incentives for conservative accounting: The influence of legal and political institutions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(1-2), 107-148.

Bushman, R. M., & Piotroski, J. D. (2006). Financial reporting incentives for conservative accounting: The role of the management incentive compensation structure. The Accounting Review, 81(5), 1555-1586.

Dichev, I. D., & Skinner, D. J. (2002). Large-sample evidence on the debt covenant hypothesis. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(4), 1091-1123.

Francis, J., & Martin, X. (2010). Acquisition profitability and timely loss recognition. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49(1-2), 161-178.

Friedman, H., Hodson, M., & Ray, B. (2020). Optimal reporting when additional information might arrive. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 70(1), 101312.

Gao, P. (2013). A measurement approach to conservatism and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56(2-3), 211-226.

García Lara, J. M., García Osma, B., & Penalva, F. (2016). Accounting conservatism and firm investment efficiency. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61(1), 221-238.

García Lara, J. M., García Osma, B., & Penalva, F. (2016). The economic consequences of accounting conservatism: Evidence from the European market. European Accounting Review, 25(2), 249-276.

Gigler, F., Kanodia, C., Sapra, H., & Venugopalan, R. (2009). Accounting conservatism and the efficiency of debt contracts. Journal of Accounting Research, 47(3), 767-797.

Goel, A. M., & Thakor, A. V. (2008). Overconfidence and mergers. The Journal of Finance, 63(2), 513-543.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.

Kim, J. B., Li, Y., & Zhang, L. (2013). Accounting conservatism and corporate governance: Evidence from the firms’ investment decisions. Journal of Accounting Research, 51(4), 887-920.

Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele University Technical Report TR/SE-0401.

Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., & Wasley, C. E. (2009). Performance matched discretionary accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 163-197.

Kothari, S. P., Shu, S., & Wysocki, P. D. (2009). Do managers withhold bad news? Journal of Accounting Research, 47(1), 241-276.

Laux, C., & Laux, V. (2024). Accounting conservatism and managerial information acquisition. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 77(2-3), 101630.

LaFond, R., & Watts, R. L. (2008). The information role of conservatism. The Accounting Review, 83(2), 447-478.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. Sage Publications.

Roberts, M. (2015). The role of dynamic renegotiation and asymmetric information in financial contracting. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(1), 61-81.

Roberts, M. R., & Sufi, A. (2009). Renegotiation of financial contracts: Evidence from private credit agreements. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(2), 159-184.

Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (Eds.). (2006). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. John Wiley & Sons.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339.

Sweeney, A. P. (1994). Debt-covenant violations and managers' accounting responses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17(3), 281-308.

Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404-428.

Watts, R. L. (2003). Conservatism in accounting part I: Explanations and implications. Accounting Horizons, 17(3), 207-221.

Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii-xxiii.

Zhang, J. (2008). The contracting benefits of accounting conservatism to lenders and borrowers. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45(1), 27-54.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-14

How to Cite

Ruslaini Ruslaini, Benardi Benardi, & Tanti Sugiharti. (2024). Interaksi Antara Laporan Keuangan Konservatif dan Insentif Manajerial dalam Pengambilan Keputusan: Tinjauan Literatur. Moneter : Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan, 2(4), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.61132/moneter.v2i4.914

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.