Krisis Epistemologis Audit Modern: Tinjauan Sistematis Teori Kecurangan, Disrupsi Teknologi, dan Kegagalan Struktural
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/anggaran.v3i4.2042Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Audit Fraud, Deepfake, Internal Control, Systematic Literature ReviewAbstract
The interval between 2018 and 2025 represents a defining epoch in financial assurance, characterized by a systemic collision between traditional audit methodologies and the exponential sophistication of fraudulent actors. This research employs a comprehensive library research methodology, utilizing Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to evaluate the evolving landscape of audit and fraud. The study traces the theoretical migration from Cressey’s Fraud Triangle to multidimensional frameworks like the Fraud Pentagon, which emphasizes the roles of arrogance and competence. Through a forensic examination of catastrophic audit failures including Wirecard, FTX, and the emerging risks of crypto-assets, the research identifies recurring patterns of auditor failure in assessing operational risks and internal controls. Furthermore, the report analyzes the dual-edged impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI); while machine learning algorithms offer enhanced detection capabilities, the rise of Generative AI (GenAI) and deepfake technology has empowered perpetrators to execute sophisticated "synthetic reality" frauds. The study critically evaluates regulatory responses, particularly the revision of International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 240, which mandates a more proactive "fraud lens." The findings suggest that the auditing profession faces an existential crisis of relevance, necessitating a fundamental shift toward a forensic mindset supported by advanced technological integration.
Downloads
References
Accounting and Auditing Institute. (2023, Desember). Analysis of the Proposed International Standard on Auditing 240 (revised)of december 2023. Accounting and Auditing Institute (Ministry of Economy, Trade and Enterprise). https://www.icac.gob.es/sites/default/files/2025-10/ESTUDIO%202C%20ISA_240_accesible.pdf
Agustina, S., & Risma Wandansari, P. P. (2023). Seberapa Efektifkah Artificial Intelligence Dalam Fraud Detection Pada Masa Covid-19: Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Aplikasi Akuntansi, 8(1), 118–130. https://doi.org/10.29303/jaa.v8i1.254
Akhiril Akbar Hasibuan & M. Irsan Nasution. (2025, Oktober). The Impact of Real-Time and Continuous Auditing on Financial Transparency and Fraud Detection: A Systematic Literature Review. Proceedings of International Conference on Islamic Community Studies, 2, 415–428. https://proceeding.pancabudi.ac.id/index.php/ICIE/article/view/601
Akter, M., Kummer, T.-F., & Yigitbasioglu, O. (2024). Looking beyond the hype: The challenges of blockchain adoption in accounting. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 53, 100681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2024.100681
Alma’aitah, R. T., Al-Hajaya, K., Sawan, N., & Alzeban, A. (2024). The impact of remote auditing on audit quality: The moderating role of technology readiness. Managerial Auditing Journal, 39(6), 624–647. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-02-2024-4210
Andreini, D., & Bettinelli, C. (2017). Business Model Innovation: From Systematic Literature Review to Future Research Directions. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53351-3
Anggi Putri, & Nuswantara, D. A. (2025). Artificial Intelligence and Data Mining in Detecting Financial Statement Fraud: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Accounting Science, 9(2), 204–257. https://doi.org/10.21070/jas.v9i2.2025
Anwar, M. A., Zakaria, A., & Musyaffi, A. M. (2025). Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan BUMN. Jurnal Akuntansi, Perpajakan dan Auditing, 6(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.21009/japa.0601.06
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2024, Februari). Top 5 Fraud Trends of 2024. Top 5 Fraud Trends of 2024. https://www.acfe.com/acfe-insights-blog/blog-detail?s=top-5-fraud-trends-of-2024
Aviva, I. Y., Suriyani, E., Himawan, H. S., & Hafizi, M. R. (2025). Effect Of Debt-To-Asset And Return On Equity Ratio On Going Concern Opinions. At-Tijaroh: Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Dan Bisnis Islam, 11(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.24952/tijaroh.v11i1.15525
CPAB Exchange. (2024, Mei). Crypto assets inspections insights. Canadian Public Accountability Board. https://cpab-ccrc.ca/docs/default-source/thought-leadership-publications/2024-crypto-assets-inspections-insights-en.pdf
De Freitas Netto, S. V., Sobral, M. F. F., Ribeiro, A. R. B., & Soares, G. R. D. L. (2020). Concepts and forms of greenwashing: A systematic review. Environmental Sciences Europe, 32(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-0300-3
Herbert M. Chain. (2023, Desember). The Key Considerations for Auditing Digital Assets and Cryptocurrencies. CBIZ. https://www.cbiz.com/insights/article/the-key-considerations-for-auditing-digital-assets-and-cryptocurrencies
Lestari, P. A., & Edeh, F. O. (2024). The Impact of Regulatory Frameworks on Fraud Detection in Auditing. Sinergi International Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 2(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijat.v2i1.477
Mabel, S. N., Payamta, P., & Winarna, J. (2025). The development of fraud prevention policies in the public sector: A bibliometric analysis. Jurnal Akuntansi & Auditing Indonesia, 119–133. https://doi.org/10.20885/jaai.vol29.iss1.art10
MindBridge. (2025, Oktober). ISA 240 (Revised): Strengthening the Auditor’s Role in Fraud Detection. https://www.mindbridge.ai/blog/isa-240-revised-strengthening-the-auditors-role-in-fraud-detection/
Qatawneh, A. M. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence in auditing and fraud detection in accounting information systems: Moderating role of natural language processing. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 33(6), 1391–1409. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-03-2024-4389
Rachmawati, S., Martias, A., Sudirja, S., & Wahyuhening F, F. (2025). Analisis Fraud Pentagon Mendeteksi Potensi Financial Statement Fraud Perusahaan IDX30 Bursa Efek Indonesia. AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis, 5(2), 691–701. https://doi.org/10.37481/jmh.v5i2.1403
Sari, N. M. (2022). ANALYSIS OF ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEM RECEIVING AND SPENDING OF BOS IN THE COVID-19 ERA. BALANCE: JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC ACCOUNTING, 3(1), 57–81. https://doi.org/10.21274/balance.v3i1.5648
Suryani, I., & Syahrudin, M. (2025). Investigative Auditing and Fraud: A Systematic Literature Review through a Theoretical and Bibliometric Lens. Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, 10(1), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.21532/apfjournal.v10i1.400
The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales. (2024). Considerations for auditing cryptocurrencies. ICAEW. https://www.icaew.com/technical/technology/blockchain-and-cryptoassets/blockchain-helpsheets/considerations-for-auditing-cryptocurrencies#
The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. (2025, Juli). ISA 240 (Revised), The Auditor’s Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements. https://www.iaasb.org/publications/isa-240-revised-auditor-s-responsibilities-relating-fraud-audit-financial-statements
Verra Rizki Amelia, Pratama, Muhammad Abshar Noer Ramadhan, Muhammad Aji Lampang, Mar’elfan Hadi Pratama, Theresia Mentari, & Dhina Sri Widyaningsih. (2024). A Systematic Literature Review of Blockchain-Based Triple-Entry Accounting in Crypto Assets. Jurnal Bisnis Mahasiswa, 4(4), 505–517. https://doi.org/10.60036/jbm.v4i4.art5
W. Steve Albrecht, Chad O. Albrecht, & Conan C. Chad O. Albrecht. (2012). Fraud Examination (Fourth). South Western, Cengage Learning.
Zamzam, I., Ivanka, V., & Ohorella, R. W. U. (2025). Fraudulent Financial Reporting and the Fraud Pentagon: Corporate Governance as a Moderator in the Financial Sector. 04(03). https://doi.org/10.63922/ijebir.v4i03.1704
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Anggaran : Jurnal Publikasi Ekonomi dan Akuntansi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



