Kinerja Keuangan BPR Syariah Ditinjau dari Aspek Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Provinsi Lampung

Authors

  • Ilham Setio Wibowo Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Lampung
  • Denny Kurniawan Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Lampung
  • Sastya Putri Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Lampung
  • Tri Endang Yulianti Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Lampung
  • Harits Kurniawan Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/santri.v2i5.897

Keywords:

PRDB, Performance Of Bpr Syariah, KAP, NPF, ROA, BOPO, FDR, Cash Ratio

Abstract

This study aims to use financial indicators to determine the effect of regional gross domestic product on the performance of Sharia BPR in Lampung. This survey method uses a quantitative descriptive survey whether the performance of the Lampung BPR SYARIAH will be influenced by Lampung's economic growth between January 2020 to December 2021. The population and sample are all BPR SYARIAH registered with the Financial Services Authority (OJK), and there are 11 BPR SYARIAH in the Lampung study area. So it can be said that the influence of KAP (X1) NPF (X2) ROA (X3) BOPO (X4) FDR (X5) CASH RATIO (X6) triggers the GRDP (Y). %, the remaining 1% is caused by other unavailable factors. The result of the f-test is known as the probability statistic F (0.017600). Because (0.05), it can be said that KAP, PAP, NPF, ROA, BOPO, FDR, and CASHRATIO together have a major influence on GRDP. And the partial significance test shows the value of Prob. KAP Ha1 was rejected because 0.05 < 0.0731, indicates a negative relationship, Prob value. NPF Ha2 is accepted because 0.0191 < 0.05 indicates a positive relationship, Prob value. ROA Ha3 is accepted because 0.0681 < 0.05 indicates a positive relationship, Prob value. BOPO Ha4 is rejected because 0.1055 < 0.05 indicates a negative relationship, Prob value. FDR Ha5 is accepted because 0.0398 < 0.05 indicates a positive relationship, Prob value. CASHRASIO Ha6 is accepted because 0.0235 < 0.05 indicates a positive relationship.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agus Harjito, & Martono. (2012). Manajemen Keuangan (Edisi ke-2). Yogyakarta: Ekonisia.

Dwinastiti, N. (2020). Pengaruh Kredit Perbankan Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Hubungannya Dengan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Kabupaten/Kota di Provinsi Kalimantan Barat. Prosiding Seminar Akademik Tahunan Ilmu Ekonomi dan Studi Pembangunan 2020, 73-91. http://feb.untan.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Ninuk-Dwiastuti.pdf

Makfiroh, L. (2021). Pengaruh Dana Pihak Ketiga (DPK), Inflasi dan Non Performing Financing (NPF) Terhadap Volume Pembiayaan Perbankan Syariah dengan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Sebagai Variabel Moderating pada Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia Tahun 2016–2020. Manajemen dan Ekonomi Islam IAIN Salatiga.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2021). Laporan Keuangan Perbankan Desember 2021. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/perbankan/data-dan-statistik/laporan-keuangan-perbankan/Default.aspx

Pujoalwanto, B. (2014). Perekonomian Indonesia: Tinjauan Historis, Teoritis dan Empiris. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&B. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suharto, F. L., & Putri, S. (2020). Viral Marketing, E-Wom and Customer Loyality. International Journal of Management (IJM), 11(8), 616-625.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-08

How to Cite

Ilham Setio Wibowo, Denny Kurniawan, Sastya Putri, Tri Endang Yulianti, & Harits Kurniawan. (2024). Kinerja Keuangan BPR Syariah Ditinjau dari Aspek Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Provinsi Lampung. SANTRI : Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan Islam, 2(5), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.61132/santri.v2i5.897