Analisis Struktur Kinerja dan Kluster Unggulan di Wilayah Kabupaten dan Kota

Authors

  • Nadya Nur Habibah Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Yasin Universitas 17 Agustus Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/anggaran.v3i4.1992

Keywords:

Small and medium enterprises (SMEs), Household industries, Spatial inequality, Industrial clustering

Abstract

The development of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and household industries is often regarded as the economic foundation of a region. However, much of the existing research in Indonesia remains focused on quantitative descriptive analysis, while providing limited attention to spatial dynamics and interregional disparities. This study aims to critically evaluate the spatial distribution patterns of SMEs and household industries at the regency and city levels, with particular emphasis on clustering tendencies, unequal distribution, and their relationships with regional characteristics. A spatial analysis approach is employed to identify spatial autocorrelation and industrial clustering patterns, which is complemented by a structural analysis of infrastructure availability, market accessibility, and regional institutional capacity. The findings indicate that the distribution of SMEs and household industries is not geographically random, but rather forms clusters that are predominantly concentrated in areas with higher levels of accessibility and economic activity. This condition reflects spatial inequality that may exacerbate development disparities between regencies and cities. Furthermore, the results reveal that uniform industrial development policies are insufficient to accommodate the diverse spatial characteristics across regions. Therefore, this study underscores the importance of formulating spatially informed and context-sensitive policies for the development of SMEs and household industries in order to promote more balanced and sustainable regional industrial development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27(2), 93–115.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Statistik usaha mikro dan kecil Indonesia. Jakarta: BPS.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Kabupaten/Kota dalam angka. Jakarta: BPS.

Capello, R. (2011). Regional economics. London: Routledge.

Fujita, M., Krugman, P., & Venables, A. J. (1999). The spatial economy: Cities, regions, and international trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483–499.

Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77–90.

Richardson, H. W. (1977). Regional growth theory. London: Macmillan.

Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2020). Economic development (13th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Widodo, T. (2006). Perencanaan pembangunan: Aplikasi komputer. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.

Yuliani, S., & Santoso, E. B. (2018). Analisis spasial perkembangan usaha kecil dan menengah di wilayah perkotaan. Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, 29(2), 123–134.

Weber, A. (1929). Theory of the location of industries. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kuncoro, M. (2012). Perencanaan daerah: Bagaimana membangun ekonomi lokal, kota, dan kawasan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Tarigan, R. (2014). Ekonomi regional: Teori dan aplikasi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Nadya Nur Habibah, & Muhammad Yasin. (2025). Analisis Struktur Kinerja dan Kluster Unggulan di Wilayah Kabupaten dan Kota. Anggaran : Jurnal Publikasi Ekonomi Dan Akuntansi, 3(4), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.61132/anggaran.v3i4.1992

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.