Penerepan Budaya Inovasi & Kreatifitas dengan Metode DMAIC dan Kaizen ( Continuous Improvement) pada PT. Indolakto Pasuruan

Yasman Yasman; Limgiani Limgiani

doi:10.61132/menawan.v2i6.979

Authors

Yasman Yasman Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang
Limgiani Limgiani Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/menawan.v2i6.979

Keywords:

Innovation, Culture, DMAIC

Abstract

A culture of innovation is very important to implement in a company to be able to maintain the existence and survival of the company. Successful innovation depends significantly on ability, skills and interpreting a rapidly changing environment. Apart from that, employee involvement also influences success in innovation. Innovation and creativity use the DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve and Control) method which is associated with KAIZEN in Japanese terms, which means "continuous improvement" which emphasizes human effort, morals, communication, training, cooperation, empowerment and self-discipline . The purpose of this research is to find out the strategy carried out by PT. Indolakto Pasuruan in motivating its employees to implement a culture of innovation as well as identifying factors inhibiting its implementation and efforts made to minimize these obstacles. This research uses qualitative research methods and tests the validity of this research data using source triangulation and member checking. From the results of this research, researchers concluded that implementing a culture of innovation in companies can have a positive impact on the company's survival. Research implications - This research makes a contribution to human resource management related to corporate culture.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alkusani, A., & Sukaris, S. (2019). Pengaruh job-engagement terhadap perilaku withdrawal melalui komitmen organisasi. Bawal Widya Riset Entrepreneurship, 2(1), 43-51.

Cane, S. (1998). Strategi Kaizen untuk menang melalui manusia: Bagaimana menciptakan program sumber daya manusia untuk memenangkan persaingan dan keuntungan. Batam: Interaksara.

Dobni, C. B. (2008). Measuring innovation culture in organizations: The development of a generalized innovation culture construct using exploratory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(4), 539-559.

Gaspersz, V. (2002). Pedoman implementasi program six sigma terintegrasi dengan ISO 9001:2000, MBNQA, dan HACCP. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Heizer, J., & Render, B. (2005). Operations management. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Knox, S. (2002). In V. Flavian (Ed.), Analisis pengembangan budaya inovasi produk pada perusahaan footwear di Sidoarjo. Jurnal Budaya Inovasi AGORA, 4(2), 2016.

Miles, B. M., & Huberman, M. (1992). Analisis data kualitatif: Buku sumber tentang metode-metode baru. Jakarta: UIP.

Moleong, L. J. (2016). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif edisi revisi. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Rediyono, & Ujianto, Mayahayati Kusumaningrum, Fani Heru Wismono, & Rustan Amarullah. (2018). Aktualisasi budaya inovasi pada organisasi sektor publik. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 14(3), 252.

Smalley, A., & K, I. (2011). Toyota Kaizen methods. Jakarta: Gradien Mediatama.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.

Suharsimi, A. (2006). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Sukaris, S., Prathiwi, M. P., & Pristyadi, B. (2020). Meningkatkan kinerja karyawan melalui keterikatan, budaya organisasi, dan gaya kepemimpinan. Equilibrium: Jurnal Ekonomi-Manajemen-Akuntansi, 16(1), 15-21.

Wan Ismail, W. K., & Majid, A. (2007). Framework of the culture of innovation: A revisit. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 9, 38-49.