Analisis Gaya Kepemimpinan Laissez-Faire terhadap Motivasi Kerja Pegawai Dinas Pertanahan dan Tata Ruang Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta

Authors

  • Annelya Agtika Farah Universitas Islam Indonesia
  • Muhammad Bakr Muhlison Universitas Islam Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/jepi.v4i3.2480

Keywords:

Decision-Making, Laissez-Faire Leadership Style, Leadership Communication, Work Coordination, Work Motivation

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the laissez-faire leadership style of the Head of the General Affairs Subdivision on the work motivation of employees working in the General Affairs Subdivision of the Regional Office of Land Affairs and Spatial Planning of the Special Region of Yogyakarta. This study employed a qualitative approach, with data collected through observation and semi-structured interviews involving several informants working in the General Affairs Subdivision of the Regional Office of Land Affairs and Spatial Planning of the Special Region of Yogyakarta. Data validity was ensured through triangulation techniques to verify the accuracy and credibility of the information obtained. Data analysis was conducted using three main stages: data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings indicate that the laissez-faire leadership style influences employees' work motivation. Limited direction from the leader, low managerial involvement, and communication constraints caused employees to perceive a lack of support in completing their work. These conditions also created difficulties in decision-making and weakened coordination among employees. Although some employees were able to perform their duties independently, the overall passive leadership style negatively affected team performance and employee motivation. The study also revealed that employees expect more open communication patterns and regular discussion forums to foster a more participative relationship between leaders and subordinates. Based on these findings, the study recommends that the organization adopt a more active, communicative, and responsive leadership approach to enhance employee motivation while improving task implementation and organizational decision-making processes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Backhaus, L., & Vogel, R. (2022). Leadership in the public sector: A meta-analysis of styles, outcomes, contexts, and methods. Public Administration Review, 82(6), 986–1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13516

Biloa, X. S. (2023). The impact of leadership style on employee job performance. Open Journal of Leadership, 12(4), 418–441. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojl.2023.124020

Bwalya, A. R. (2023). Leadership styles. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.23932113

Chen, S., & Cuervo, J. C. (2022). The influence of transformational leadership on work engagement in the context of learning organization mediated by employees’ motivation. The Learning Organization, 29(5), 567–585. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-01-2022-0011

Hasanah, N., Fiqriyah, F., Sallza Azzahra, R., Dhia Rizki Atthar, A., & Safuan, S. (2026). Laissez-faire leadership style and its implications on the work environment and employee performance in public organizations: A study at the DKI Jakarta Education Office. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, 7(1), 161–166. https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v7i1.2169

Jaafar, S. B., Mamat Zambi, N., & Fathil, N. F. (2021). Leadership style: Is it autocratic, democratic or laissez-faire? ASEAN Journal of Management and Business Studies, 3(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.26666/rmp.ajmbs.2021.1.1

Khassawneh, O., & Elrehail, H. (2022). The effect of participative leadership style on employees’ performance: The contingent role of institutional theory. Administrative Sciences, 12(4), Article 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12040195

Latham, G. P. (2012). Work motivation: History, theory, research, and practice. SAGE Publications.

Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created social climates. The Journal of Social Psychology, 10(2), 269–299.

Lundmark, R., Richter, A., & Tafvelin, S. (2022). Consequences of managers’ laissez-faire leadership during organizational restructuring. Journal of Change Management, 22(1), 40–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2021.1951811

Mahmudi, D., Purnadi, P., Kharismasyah, A. Y., & Randikaparsa, I. (2025). The effect of motivation, career development, and transformational leadership style on employee job satisfaction at the Banyumas BPN Spatial Planning Office. Asian Journal of Applied Business and Management, 4(3), 915–930. https://doi.org/10.55927/ajabm.v4i3.386

Northouse, P. G. (2016). Leadership: Theory and practice. SAGE Publications.

Nugroho, L. B., & Prayekti, P. (2023). The influence of organizational culture, compensation, interpersonal communication on job satisfaction in employees of the Land and Spatial Planning Office Yogyakarta City. Economos: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 6(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.31850/economos.v6i1.2238

Nur, I. (2024). The influence of leadership style, motivation, and work discipline on the performance of employees in the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency (BPN–National Land Agency). International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 11(2), 156. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v11i2.5414

Rizky, A. N., Adam, M., & Yunus, M. (2023). The influence of leadership style and affective behavior on work motivation and its impact on employee performance of Aceh Province National Land Agency. International Journal of Scientific and Management Research, 6(3), 96–103. https://doi.org/10.37502/IJSMR.2023.6307

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational behavior (17th ed.). Pearson Education.

Robert, V., & Vandenberghe, C. (2021). Laissez-faire leadership and affective commitment: The roles of leader-member exchange and subordinate relational self-concept. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36(4), 533–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-020-09700-9

Salin, D., Baillien, E., & Notelaers, G. (2022). High-performance work practices and interpersonal relationships: Laissez-faire leadership as a risk factor. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 854118. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.854118

Thanh, N. H., & Quang, N. V. (2022). Transformational, transactional, laissez-faire leadership styles and employee engagement: Evidence from Vietnam’s public sector. SAGE Open, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221094606

Zai, P. N., & Syafril, R. (2025). The influence of leadership style on employee work motivation. Journal of Educational Management Research, 4(3), 994–1009. https://doi.org/10.61987/jemr.v4i3.1047

Downloads

Published

2026-08-19

How to Cite

Annelya Agtika Farah, & Muhammad Bakr Muhlison. (2026). Analisis Gaya Kepemimpinan Laissez-Faire terhadap Motivasi Kerja Pegawai Dinas Pertanahan dan Tata Ruang Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan Indonesia, 4(3), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.61132/jepi.v4i3.2480

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.